Yes I bought a new 2016 Burgman 200, and it's pretty much exactly what I'd expected, in a good way. The main reason I got it instead of a 400 is that I already have a 650, so I already have a big, fast, and heavy scooter for when I want or need that. The problem was that my small, agile, and light scooter (a 150cc Vespa) was just not quite up
Iam running an Michelin Pilot Power Pure SC Rear Tire on my 400 right now and its once of the nicest riding tires I've had on any scoot. Especially on the freeway. I can't speak to longevity yet as its only got 1000 miles on it but I'll let you know. 2008 Burgman 400 w/60,100 miles. 1999 Honda Helix w/46,500 miles.
More2004 Yamaha Majesty 400 information Our discussion forums are intended for short messages. We also welcome more extensive motorcycle reviews. Bikez also recommends that you check out the technical data and the riders' rating for the 04 Yamaha Majesty 400. You can also rate it yourself. Use our efficient motorcycle classifieds to sell or buy this bike.
2005Suzuki Burgman 650, blue metallic. but I can tell you from personal experience that the Majesty 400 is a credible touring machine. Very credible. My two years (and 25,000 miles) on a 2005 Majesty 400 was one
Ihave documented some of the measurements in My Decision to Buy the Burgman 650 and the Technical Specifications. In short: the 650 is 1 cm shorter than the 400! It has the same body width of 65 cm in the front, and when the mirrors are in, it is smaller than the 400! Yes, these are facts!
Burgman650-----I would not be afraid of new/off the showroom floor650 and it would work well for me for the 50,000miles I usually ride a new bike. Most rider complaints come from riders who bought used/old-----have trouble and expect Suzuki to pay for fix. Based on weight Burgman 400 works better for my scooter riding style
. 463 134 232 301 172 306 370 374
majesty 400 vs burgman 400
